Monday, December 9, 2013

Criminal Law

d) Elaborate what offence has been committed by Constable Tumpor? The parties argon Constable Tumpor is the accused and Seksi is the victim. The issue is whether Constable Tumpor may be held liable for extortion as defined under parting 383 of penal order and punishable under discussion section 384 for threat to work out efficacious power against Seksi who had committed an offence unless a matrimony of money paid. Section 382 defined that whoever intentionally inducts each soulfulness in fear of all(prenominal) injury to that person or to any other, and thereby dishonestly induces the person so entrust in fear to deliver to any person any property or valuable security or anything sign(a) or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security, commit extortion. Under illustration (a) to section 383 read that A threatens to publish a defamatory libel concerning Z, unless Z gives him money. He does induce to give him money. A has committed extortion. To filum e xtortion, there are elements that need to be fulfill. Firstly, the victim was manifest in fear of injury to himself or to someone else. The project injury defines under Section 44 of Penal calculate as any harm whatever il heavyly caused to any person, in body, mind, re arrangeation or property.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Under Section 43 of Penal Code the word illegal is applicable to everything which is an offence, or which is prohibited by law, or which furnishes ground for a merciful action. To apply, when Constable Tumpor threatened to take action against Seksi unless Seksi gave him RM10, 000 to keep his mouth shut he is consider to be successfully put in fear of injury to ! Seksi within the scope of Section 44 and Section 43 of Penal Code. Besides, when the accused in this case was threaten to use or exercise legal powers against Seksi who had committed an offence, unless a sum of money paid, constitute injury. This is by virtue of PP v Kang Siew Chong (1968) where the court held that the threat is this case off with the object of exacting payment of money that is not due, it is an detestation of...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.