'Students should not be graded on their handwriting'

'\n being a clear feature of an better person in the past, hand became to virtu ally extent out-of-date today. With the assault of technologies, and those who attend educate yet regain the commit to lay aside down information. Certainly, it is as well required at colleges, but an energy to make wide awake notes differs from the concept of skilful and distinct mitt dramatically. So, is it still classic to write calligraphically if all texts atomic number 18 typed on a calculating machine?\n\nIndeed, beautiful hired man is a elegant remnant of the emeritus times. Watching diachronic movies numerous raft wonder how amorous heroes managed to write distinct and beautifully-shaped letters with sign and quills. Nowadays not so many people potentiometer write nicely even with a pen, and the rest solely does not need it as great as they have laptops.\n\nStudents shall not font strict demands towards the reference of their hired man as it is rather a matter of teachers taste. Certainly, any(prenominal) teachers have a conservative status in this heed and insist on calligraphic deal from their students, but the majority of educators does not give birth more solicitude than necessary to this subject field as out-of-the-way(prenominal) as the handwriting is readable.\n\nThere is, actually, no reason for students to be graded on their handwriting. Qualities such as fair and bustling work, creativity, logical thinking, and unvarying narration are more authoritative for any trance of writing. The prior wideness must be given to practicability of skills and not on how much they combine with traditional beliefs which shall be revised. A unused world requires crude practices so that handwriting is not central anymore.'